aa

Pluralism and Contestation in the Interpretive History of Qur'an Surah al-Anfāl: 41

Authors

  • 👤

    Ummu Uswatun Labibah

    🏛️ UIN Sunan Ampel, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • 👤

    Chusna Maladani

    🏛️ UIN Sunan Ampel, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • 👤

    Mohammad Lutfianto

    🏛️ STIU Darussalam, Bangkalan, Indonesia

Keywords:

Khums, Tafsir, Islamic Law, Doctrinal History, Contemporary Islamic Thought

Abstract

This article investigates the enduring and multifaceted interpretive conflict surrounding the Qur’anic verse of khums (Q. 8:41), a foundational text for Islamic law, theology, and concepts of authority. This study employs a diachronic, historical-comparative analysis of a textual corpus from classical Islamic exegesis (tafsir) to contemporary scholarly and ideological works, including influential modern Indonesian commentators. The findings reveal a multi-layered evolution of interpretation. What began as a formative legal debate over the term ghanīma hardened into a fundamental Sunni-Shi'i schism rooted in competing political theologies of the Caliphate and the Imamate. Within Sunnism, a structured pluralism emerged, with the four primary legal schools issuing distinct rulings grounded in their respective hermeneutical principles. Beyond jurisprudence, the verse was also appropriated for non-legal ends: as an allegory for the soul's journey by Sufi mystics and as a tool of statecraft by the Ottoman and Safavid empires. In the modern era, thinkers from traditionalist, modernist, and Islamist backgrounds—such as Hamka, Quraish Shihab, and Sayyid Qutb—continue to reinterpret the verse in response to the challenges of the nation-state and contemporary ideologies. This research provides a comprehensive historical map of a single verse’s interpretive life, demonstrating how a sacred text functions as a dynamic mirror reflecting the evolution of Islamic law, identity, and thought from the classical age to the present day.

Downloads

References

Abū al-Suʿūd, M. ibn M. (1994). Tafsīr Abī al-Suʿūd al-musammá Irshād al-ʿAql al-Salīm ilá Mazāyā al-Qurʾān al-Karīm (al-Ṭabʿah). Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī.

Af, A., Syakur, S., & Susmihara. (2023). Melacak Akar Permasalahan Hubungan Antara Sunni dan Syi’ah. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Sosial. https://doi.org/10.58540/jipsi.v1i4.151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.58540/jipsi.v1i4.151

al-Bukhārī, M. bin I. (1981). al-Jāmiʿ al-ṣaḥīḥ. Dār al-Fikr.

al-Fayḍ al-Kāshānī, M. (1998). Kitāb al-Ṣāfī fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān (M. al-Ḥusaynī al-Amīnī (ed.); Vol. 7). Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmiyya.

Al-Qurṭubī, M. ibn A. (1967). al-Jāmiʻ li-aḥkām al-Qurʼān (al-Ṭabʻah). Dār al-Kātib al-ʻArabī.

al-Qushayrī, ʻAbd al-Karīm ibn Hawāzin. (1981). Laṭāʼif al-Ishārāt (I. Basyūnī (ed.); 2nd ed.). al-Hayʼah al-Miṣriyyah al-ʻĀmma li-l-Kitāb.

Al-Zuḥaylī, W. (1991). al-Tafsīr al-Munīr: fī al-ʿAqīdah wa al-Sharīʿah wa al-Manhaj (al-Ṭabʿah). Dār al-Fikr al-Muʿāṣir ; Dār al-Fikr.

Alsaied, M. (2025). Interpretation of Religious Texts and Its Impact on Coexistence with Others. Journal of Posthumanism. https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i3.944 DOI: https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i3.944

Brand, M. (2022). Cross‐Cultural Generalisation in Three Research Practices: Historicising, Comparing, and Theorising in the Study of Religions*. Journal of Religious History. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9809.12906 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9809.12906

Esposito, J. (2015). Islam and Political Violence. Religions, 6(3), 1067–1081. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel6031067 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel6031067

Fachrurozi, & Subhi, M. (2024). The Early Development of Islamic Law: Examining the Rational and Flexible Nature of Compilation and Standardization. Jurnal Fuaduna : Jurnal Kajian Keagamaan Dan Kemasyarakatan. https://doi.org/10.30983/fuaduna.v8i1.8400 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30983/fuaduna.v8i1.8400

Fadillah, M. I., Purnomo, B., & Purnamasari, I. (2024). Islamic Economic Principles: A Critical Review of Capitalism and a Vision for Justice. Equity: Jurnal Ekonomi. https://doi.org/10.33019/equity.v12i2.381 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33019/equity.v12i2.381

Hamka. (1982). Tafsir Al-Azhar (5th ed.). Pustaka Panjimas.

Hayati, Z., Ulfah, I. M., Ananda, S., & Siregar, M. R. (2024). Fiscal Policy in Islamic Perspective Tracking from Historical Literature Review. PKM-P. https://doi.org/10.32832/jurma.v8i1.2232 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32832/jurma.v8i1.2232

Husayn, N. (2020). Aḥkām concerning the ahl al-bayt. Islamic Law and Society, 27, 145–184. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-00260a11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-00260A11

Ibn al-ʿArabī, M. ibn ʿAlī. (1968). al-Futūḥāt al-Makkīyah. Dār Ṣādir.

Ibn Kathīr, I. ibn ʻUmar. (1980). Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-’Azīm. Maktabah Dār al-Turāth.

Jalāl al-Dīn al-Suyūṭī. (2008). al-Itqān fī ’Ulūm al-Qur’ān. Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Jaṣṣāṣ, A. ibn ʿAlī, & Shāhīn, ʿAbd al-Salām Muḥammad ʿAlī. (1994). Aḥkām al-Qurʾān. Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah.

Kamali, M. (2015). The Moderating Role of Ikhtilāf (Reasoned Disagreement). 110–114. https://doi.org/10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780190226831.003.0011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190226831.003.0011

Kennedy, H. (2014). Landholding and Law in the Early Islamic State. 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004277878_010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004277878_010

Laabdi, M. (2024). ᶜIlm al-ikhtilāf in Modern Western and Muslim Studies of Juristic Disagreement–A Critical Analysis. Journal of College of Sharia and Islamic Studies. https://doi.org/10.29117/jcsis.2024.0389 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29117/jcsis.2024.0389

Majlisī, M. B. ibn M. T. (2011). Jawāmiʻ al-Akhbār : fī al-aḥādīth Biḥār al-Anwār (First edit). ISRA Academy Press.

Makārim Shīrāzī, N. (2002). al-Amthāl fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-ʿAẓīm. Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī.

Morimoto, K. (2020). Sayyid-ness beyond the Borders of South Asia. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 30, 505–511. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135618632000036X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S135618632000036X

Muchsin, M. A. (Corresponding A., & Manan, A. (2019). Historical Development of Tax During the Early Islamic Period: Jizyah and Kharaj. Journal of Al-Tamaddun, 14(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.22452/JAT.vol14no2.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22452/JAT.vol14no2.1

Myaskur, F. M. A., H, G. A. Z. M., Wardhana, M., & Faridillah, N. (2024). Syiah di Mata Anak Muda: Antara Ketakutan dan Keterbukaan akan Keberagaman Agama. TARUNALAW : Journal of Law and Syariah. https://doi.org/10.54298/tarunalaw.v2i02.200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54298/tarunalaw.v2i02.200

Pagani, S. (2004). The Meaning of The Ikhtilāf Al-madhāhib In ’Abd Al-wahhāb Al-sha’rānī’s Al-mīzān Al-kubrā. Islamic Law and Society, 11, 177–212. https://doi.org/10.1163/156851904323178746 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156851904323178746

Qummī, ʿAlī ibn Ibrāhīm. (2014). Tafsīr al-Qummī (al-Ṭabʿah). Muʾassasat al-Imām al-Mahdī.

Quṭb, S. (2005). Fī Ẓilāl al-Qurʾān (al-Ṭabʿah al-Sharʿīyah 35). Dār al-Shurūq.

Reichmuth, S. (2017). Aspects of Prophetic Piety in the Early Modern Period. Archives Des Sciences Sociales Des Religions, 129–150. https://doi.org/10.4000/ASSR.29454 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/assr.29454

Sachedina, A. (1980). Al-Khums: The Fifth in the Imāmī Shīʿī Legal System. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 39, 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1086/372828 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/372828

Sharif, M. F. M., & Abdullah, A. (2021). A Study on Ghanima and Fai’ as Warfare Property of Early Islam: The First Twenty Three Years. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i10/10621 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i10/10621

Shihab, M. Q. (2002). Tafsir al-Mishbah : pesan, kesan dan keserasian Al-Qur’an. Lentera Hati.

Sumadi, E. (2025). Telaah Harta dalam Perspektif Al-Qur’an: Amanah dan Tanggung Jawab Sosial. IMTIYAZ: Jurnal Ilmu Keislaman. https://doi.org/10.46773/imtiyaz.v9i1.1589 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46773/imtiyaz.v9i1.1589

Ṭūsī, M. ibn al-Ḥasan. (1998). Kitāb al-Khilāf (al-Ṭabʿah). Muʾassasat al-Nashr al-Islāmī al-Tābiʿah li-Jamāʿat al-Mudarrisīn.

Valkenberg, P. (2022). A Companion to Comparative Theology. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004388390 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004388390

Yousefi, N. A.-D. (2019). Confusion and Consent: Land Tax (Kharāj) and the Construction of Judicial Authority in the Early Islamic Empire (ca. 12–183 A.H./634–800 C.E.). Sociology of Islam. https://doi.org/10.1163/22131418-00702004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/22131418-00702004

Zalmat, A. (2024). The Concept of the Science of Religions and Its Origins in Islamic and Western Thought. AL-IKHSAN: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies. https://doi.org/10.61166/ikhsan.v2i2.52 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61166/ikhsan.v2i2.52

ʿAyyāshī, M. ibn M., & Rasūlī Maḥallātī, H. (2010). Tafsīr al-ʿAyyāshī. Manshūrāt Muʾassasat al-Aʿlamī li-l-Maṭbūʿāt.

Published

2025-11-30

How to Cite

Pluralism and Contestation in the Interpretive History of Qur’an Surah al-Anfāl: 41. (2025). An-Nur International Journal of The Quran & Hadith, 3(2), 108-122. https://doi.org/10.62032/aijqh.v3i2.124